@james's Stats
0xb89465f04caf9334d3d116637ac2a9c4aa8dcff6
Account Overview
Quick Info
Most Loved Peeps
Replying to @james (0xb89465f04caf9334d3d116637ac2a9c4aa8dcff6)
Yeah, though I think it might be unfair for me to call it spam. It was more just an increase in low quality posts. I say low quality because the user in question did not value their thoughts highly enough to share them for ~1c previously.
But then again, does burning money really indicate quality? Or does it just indicate that the poster is well-to-do and likes the sound of their own voice?
1 Enso
Replying to @james (0xb89465f04caf9334d3d116637ac2a9c4aa8dcff6)
State channels are the best but you lose intermediate state + must keep an eye on timeouts. Plasma is great but you lose decentralization. Both have free / instant tx. Subchains retain state and decentralization, free tx when batched, more tx per rootchain block.
Here is a much better / fancier version of the subchain idea: https://ethresear.ch/t/on-chain-scaling-to-potentially-500-tx-sec-through-mass-tx-validation/3477
1 Enso