Peeps by @Jet86
Showing page 1 of 1 (19 peeps total)
Replying to @Bevan (0x30755d3e65c0cf46c35b72d11e52d941c5fc3a3e)
Hey all- Peepeth's new crowdfunding page is live! https://peepeth.com/a/crowdfunding There, you can support with ether, tokens, and credit card. Thanks for everyone's help getting Peepeth this far! 🙏
On the new crowdfunding site, the $25 tier doesn't appear to include the "audit flagged content" option anymore. Only $50 and above. Is that intentional?
Building a BBC Micro:Bit Robo:Bit in preparation for the Spotlight18 #RobotSwarm Competition. #Spotlight18 #CEDoW #STEM #STEMed https://youtu.be/mCPSiG4K5-w
Replying to @BigDrunkBear (0x2059f560b33bf4101a19739cbc789850661e5cdc)
Personally, I wouldn't mind Peepeth putting a little more distance in between themselves and Twitter. Let Peepeth be Peepeth and Twitter be Twitter.
I like that I can post something on Peepeth and have it go to Twitter - TBH it encourages me to use Peepeth more. I just think the #ux around tagged usernames may need some tweaking to handle disparities properly...
Tweeting at the same time as Peeping is awesome, but it breaks down a bit when users are tagged that only exist on one of the two systems, or worse, if the username is on both but belongs to different people...
Replying to @Bevan (0x30755d3e65c0cf46c35b72d11e52d941c5fc3a3e)
Good question. The tendency is to Peep like we Tweet. However, Peepeth is fundamentally different. The UI should better reflect that peeping is not a toy :) How else can that be communicated?
The question is, do we actually need to delete peeps? Can't we just agree that it's okay to make mistakes?
This is my pal Addie. #dogsofpeepeth #adventureswithaddie
Finally got around to watching this great keynote. Very engaging and worth watching: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajGX7odA87k #security #machinelearning #iot
Replying to @Bevan (0x30755d3e65c0cf46c35b72d11e52d941c5fc3a3e)
Welcome, WallETH! Thanks for the suggestion, will look into this. Other verifications will be coming as well, including URL verification.
Reddit verifications could be another one to consider (if you haven't already).
Replying to @j12d (0xb58aea7d22dbc32d38a274038aef3866c0012559)
Hello from Sydney Australia.
Also from Sydney :) Welcome.
Replying to @GamalSchmuck (0x5f8c5e86c6f584eb689d4bca9ad356e1834c597b)
Sometimes #Germans are called Kartoffel ;-)
We do that in Australia too, although only for a select few... https://junkee.com/peter-dutton-potatoes/172242 #politics
@Bevan also a question about signing peeps - is there any impact for Peepeth.com if a user signs all actions instantly vs batching up to 15 at a time? (ie what is the "nicer" thing for me to do)
@Bevan slight usability feedback - from the notifications page I can't command-click (macOS) a username to open their profile in a new tab because the link is a javascript action. #UX
Replying to @Bevan (0x30755d3e65c0cf46c35b72d11e52d941c5fc3a3e)
This will be possible on Peepeth itself for some supporters of the Kickstarter :)
Is that the "Audit flagged content" reward? I already backed that level, I'll be interested to see how that's implemented.
Replying to @Bevan (0x30755d3e65c0cf46c35b72d11e52d941c5fc3a3e)
Also @sponnet has created a tool to facilitate this: https://peepeth.com/sponnet/peeps/QmQ3LPjh3HeQ3EKhz3ppv9tz8Bo17Fi6rzVuSkoTugV19m
Thanks for the link - that looks hugely valuable!
Replying to @sevvie (0xb9a7922eec475605498ba3c1f7f0aca98585f30a)
Will you be replacing the text on the dApp library? This seems misleading based on what you've said in this video.
Given that all the data is stored on the blockchain, it is possible (though perhaps not trivial) to create a "canary" system to highlight when the Peepeth.com frontend is moderating or hiding content. I've been mulling over the idea of starting a FOSS project to do this...