Aaaand the links don’t work on Peepeth lol. These should:

Listen at: https://anchor.fm/bitgenstein
Read at:
https://bitgenste.in/ep8

Thanks to @peepethApp’s @Bevan Barton in “Heresy, Privacy & Censorship #1: Monero, Peepeth, Kierkegaard”

Peepeth incorporates censorship resistance AND moderation, addressing many of my concerns in the episode.

Listen at: anchor.fm/bitgenstein
Or read it: bitgenste.in/ep8 $ETH

Thanks! Just sent you a couple of questions. I look forward to it & happy to help the campaign.

Speech-to-text for cryptocurrency tweets is the worst.

“Uses Z Case Norcs for privacy. After it’s a CEO, token was listed on exchanges Who will be and Butt for next. Dab lunch is soon.”

Hey @Bevan, I want to mention Peepeth & the KS in a podcast ep. Thursday, ~4k listens. DTube also gets a mention. It’s on censorship (historically of heresy & sedition, recently of several public figures across the political spectrum) Have a minute to chat or at least 1-2 quotes?

Much excite: I just backed Peepeth, the Social Network For A Better World on @Kickstarter.

Impressed by the live platform so far (MetaMask required). Hoping it's one of the first wave of dapps with actual adoption.

http://kck.st/2N7Xh5a @peepethApp

Peepeth, the uncensorable, decentralized Twitter, is launching a #Kickstarter to raise a little money for developing a native mobile app and more. Time to start peeping again. https://peepeth.com @peepethApp

Oh Charles! (And Bizarro Charles)

#ada #cryptocurrency

Peepeth cut off the image and didn’t activate the link:D

Let’s try this again. “Ethereum Challengers #2: EOS” at https://bitgenste.in/EOS

The irony of posting on #Ethereum Challengers to Peepeth is not lost on me, but this week’s is #EOS.

Also talks Byzantine Generals, DPoS, mass adoptability, Everipedia, etc.

Check it out on the ICO Alert blog or at bitgenste.in/eos
(Next week is ADA.)

Lol, I’ll take some DEEZ if this is still open. Thanks for promoting the cause

Should I switch from #Cipher? #Coinbase acquired them recently, not sure where that’s heading

Indeed. I use it with Cipher browser, too. Welcome to Peepeth!

@Bevan @NeerajKA suggestion for Peepeth badge down the line: Coin Center supporter

“Peep” as a word has so much more memepower than “tweet”

Ready the dank meme cannons, @neerajka just joined

Probably better to give you the first Peep rather than the last eh

https://peepeth.com/bitgenstein/peeps/QmZU7nzfWWWbmn6pxKoa6ZYNTysyyVcQgiFa37ceDkxede

Hey @Zanzi, check out the quick GDPR/blockchain Peepeth discussion we had at https://peepeth.com/bitgenstein/peeps/QmSck5LCcWMMef9c3giq8SFeBHbpPW2rMsPRCNNVjqv5HE

Convos are a little tricky to follow on Peepeth still but, there were some ideas had

Well written. Note that MetaMask isn’t the only option:) Cipher on iOS works for example (compatible with MetaMask too tho)

I shall provide you an Ensō shortly

This is part of why protections like double-sig (txs to invalid addresses get sent back) and maybe human-readable addresses are crucial to mass adoption

That’s how I use it. @cipherbrowser can even import an existing MetaMask account and use your iPhone’s Secure Enclave

Ah, fascinating. Perhaps I’ll follow this 10-platform survey with a philosophical piece.

Spoilers: we’re innovating self-governing collectives that don’t require infeasible dedication at the individual level to keep running. Quite a novelty. #anarchosociocapitalistmarxism, lol

Thoughtful points! I don’t make any kind of actual prediction in my bit regarding the two. You’re right that “competitors” may be more clickbait than truth; “alternatives” might prove truer but sounds awfully boring, doesn’t it:)?

The first #cryptocurrency in this 10-part series was one I needed to research more: #RSK (#RootStock), whose #BTC hybrid sidechains might challenge #Ethereum

https://blog.icoalert.com/the-ethereum-competitors-ep-1-rsk-rootstock-d8e416466b21

Not sure. Just a rough example idea, and quite possibly not best GDPR solution

Chain never holds the unencrypted data point in question, but a sm. contract can use data key from decentralized mgmt to read/process data point, if key is there. Could even “recycle” data to new key

Re: size, maybe. Depends on the b-chain design.

Re: keys, they couldn’t demand from a decentralized data key mngmnt system

E.g. user has key that only allows deletion of data key, not retrieval of key, & wants to “delete” medical data on one ledger as he is switching to another

@alec @bryce @balresch But I understand your concerns. Transparency is one of the greatest ways blockchain can change the world for good.

@alec @balresch Actually, I could do it today on any major chain: add encrypted data and then later destroy the key.

Not seeing anything about blockchain inherently contrary to this as the data on the ledger is still immutable. Decentralized data-key mngmnt could work

Awesome article. Would’ve hated to miss this one.

Imagine if Holocaust/Khmer Rouge/etc. victims had been able to bring their identity and wealth anywhere with just a password in their heads

@alec @bryce @balresch Exactly, I’m not suggesting mutability or anything drastic, just an idea enabling the protections of blockchain and yet also allowing the privacy many people take seriously.

Just a thought experiment; EU will go after privacy violators however they can.

I was proposing a possible solution to chat about; it’s not in place currently, at least for most networks. A system like that would still be immutable but would allow very specifically defined parts to be made inaccessible, while still preventing forgery, double-spend, etc.

It’s not that I don’t understand; there are a number of applications in which privacy is desirable but e.g. forgery and post-editing is not. Or in which associating personal data is really not critical to ledger integrity.

No way. Revealing my n00bness:)

@Bryce @BradyDale I’m not thinking of violating immutability. What about solutions where for example a key to decrypt a given person’s private data on the #blockchain is destroyed? Blockchain remains immutable, but “right to be forgotten” remains

Just an example. @peeplosophy

#peeplosophy The EU’s GDPR promises citizens the “right to deletion” (“right to be forgotten”).

Watching to see if #blockchain devs in general consider solutions or just ignore:p

@abcoathup here’s an example of why #Peepeth might want to integrate easy private messages: I want to tell you about “buidling” in your message to the world, but I don’t wanna be a jerk about it by being all public:p

#cryptodreams

Dreamed #Bitcoin went to $50. Bought more, told *all* my friends to.

Then it went to $0.

Welcome Matteo!

I worked with non-profits (orphans) for years, and one concern about *some* libertarian tenets popular in #cryptocurrency is that they might leave the poor behind.

So I greatly appreciate seeing #charity initiatives like this one! Thanks for including it in #Peepeth.

Good points about free people. Quick q: EOS (and others) aim for a future w/o user-facing transaction fees, or w/ fees essentially built into mathematically-controlled inflation. Maybe social media and even Peeps will eventually live in a model both free *and* “free”?

Testing if Peepeth reply convos work like Twitter...

(6/6) The old guard will, quietly or claiming to aid the revolution, move to seize power even as decentralized services – exchanges, marketplaces, interoperability, etc. – ostensibly decrease reliance on trust. They are increasingly doing this by acquiring companies.

(5/6) “Trustless” and “oligarchy” are incompatible concepts, of course. We have yet to design a system resistant enough to oligarchy to be adequately described as trustless, unless I just haven’t found it yet.

(4/6) E.g. few people foresaw Satoshi’s decentralized-sounding whitepaper yielding a new form of oligarchy. Now new consensus models potentially have the same outcomes, via different paths. Some are even oligarchical by design.

(3/6) I believe you’re right on wealth centralization being the greatest problem. And that it will happen mostly in ways we didn’t predict.

(2/6) That’s exactly why the warning, though: we all develop expectations, which can become blinders – and prevent us from noticing the greatest new dangers until they’ve gathered enough strength.

1/6) Freedom revolutions usually (always?) go this way, yet specific far-out predictions are nearly always wrong:) So I hesitate to make them.