Peeps by @daniellmesquita
Showing page 11 of 29 (1,425 peeps total)
Replying to @jm9k (0xa7bd09daab3eb5ec96f04914d94c47681489d604)
I don't see how UBI could work as an improvement in today's world. I've known far too many people who would completely stop working if there was any possible way for them to just freeload off others. It will free up a few to innovate, but they are the far minority.
"stop working if there was any possible way for them to just freeload off others"
That's exactly what g-mens investing in big corporations you defend products from (Microsoft's TypeScript, Facebook's ReactJS) does.
Replying to @galoisconnection (0x2644b6ad2075a823f7f82bfeb940da9c4022cec7)
3) Wealth is not meritocratic, it is the result of generations of violence and exploitation. Wells are owned by the people with the bigger stick, not the people that dug them. UBIs benefit entrepreneurs and people in between jobs, which is good but won’t prevent mass depopulation
Not only entrepreneurs and people between in jobs, but a UBI are to benefit the whole mankind if in accord to the Relative Theory of Money.
Replying to @galoisconnection (0x2644b6ad2075a823f7f82bfeb940da9c4022cec7)
2) UBIs will disproportionately benefit the middle and upper-middle classes, no different than social security. It will be a marginal improvement, but not enough to prevent the deaths of millions due to the effects of global warming and housing scarcity. All part of the plan tho
I think the same about plans. All showed social advancements (while others are hidden and attacked) are delusions to make people feel comfortable but with back doors to be exploited.
I support UBI. What I agree with you and I'm against are the UBIs made by governments.
I'm proud about this peep. It's from the epoch people used Peepeth instead of Twitter. Now Peepeth is just a post war scenario with only a few weird persons using it.
Replying to @NJItalia (0x9f60e10327f092087298eb626ff3c29d5761030b)
I do think it is possible nowadays; with crypto-currencies. How it can be implemented, I don't know. Simply throwing bitcoin at everyone and calling it "UBI" seems too simple to be true.
How did you knew I were recently searching on Twitter about UBI?
It's weird. You'd replied to a months older peep.
But, if you want to know how Universal Basic Income is feasible in crypto, just search about Duniter
Replying to @kouekitsuholab (0xfd66996666bee5aa6adeb375c6efcedb86151138)
ahg0ohnaes1tahph4phe3Boh8aicei
Explaining what you know about yourself since your birch and how you see the entire existence.
Replying to @daniellmesquita (0xddfc2e10702d8a781727a34d83b3bb3ca94a3e91)
In 2015 I was anti-Dilma, they shows that to PT. In 2016 I became a communist, they shows that to far-right. In 2017 I became a socialist/liquid capitalist, they shows that to communist. In 2018 I said to support Bolsonaro (to make people fight), they used that against.
They took a picture from me at a leftist protest, they say to the right: "daniell is a leftist".
I speak against the sexualization of children in veiled pedo while funk music is spread to them, they says "daniell is a conservator".
People can't be impartial in a polarized word.
Replying to @daniellmesquita (0xddfc2e10702d8a781727a34d83b3bb3ca94a3e91)
Recently I were against Coraline Ada Ehmke, they shows that to the queer programmers. I'd signed Coraline's post-meritocracy manifesto and supported the code covenant in 2019, they shows that to anti-lgbt groups. They uses different timelines to attack you to different groups.
In 2015 I was anti-Dilma, they shows that to PT.
In 2016 I became a communist, they shows that to far-right.
In 2017 I became a socialist/liquid capitalist, they shows that to communist.
In 2018 I said to support Bolsonaro (to make people fight), they used that against.
Replying to @daniellmesquita (0xddfc2e10702d8a781727a34d83b3bb3ca94a3e91)
I was a agnostic in 2017, they shows these recordings (videos, audios) to atheists. I was Christian in 2018, they shows that to atheists. I was atheist also in 2018, they shows that to Christians. They shows a past as your present to defame you to any group of people.
Recently I were against Coraline Ada Ehmke, they shows that to the queer programmers.
I'd signed Coraline's post-meritocracy manifesto and supported the code covenant in 2019, they shows that to anti-lgbt groups.
They uses different timelines to attack you to different groups.
Replying to @daniellmesquita (0xddfc2e10702d8a781727a34d83b3bb3ca94a3e91)
I'd showed not liking Felipe Neto and not having he anymore as my idol, then they shows it to his fans and aligned people. In the past I'd showed love to Felipe Neto, they shows that to "bolsominions", religious and other conservators. They uses a time according to the people.
I was a agnostic in 2017, they shows these recordings (videos, audios) to atheists.
I was Christian in 2018, they shows that to atheists.
I was atheist also in 2018, they shows that to Christians.
They shows a past as your present to defame you to any group of people.
Replying to @daniellmesquita (0xddfc2e10702d8a781727a34d83b3bb3ca94a3e91)
Not only unbiased, I say specifically about being impartial. It is like a competition in a FPS game. You can't say the system is wrong and full of cheats, you're obliged to just choose a side and be hypocrite in the theater of distracting people
I'd showed not liking Felipe Neto and not having he anymore as my idol, then they shows it to his fans and aligned people.
In the past I'd showed love to Felipe Neto, they shows that to "bolsominions", religious and other conservators.
They uses a time according to the people.
Replying to @daniellmesquita (0xddfc2e10702d8a781727a34d83b3bb3ca94a3e91)
"bolsomions" says Bolsonaro is good - in contrast, I say he is bad. Fearful, pseudo-activists claim Bolsonaro is the worst problem - in contrast, I say there are worse problem hidden. Being unbiased is asking to be hated by everyone.
Not only unbiased, I say specifically about being impartial.
It is like a competition in a FPS game. You can't say the system is wrong and full of cheats, you're obliged to just choose a side and be hypocrite in the theater of distracting people
Replying to @daniellmesquita (0xddfc2e10702d8a781727a34d83b3bb3ca94a3e91)
You're hated for being unbiased in a polarized world. While Freemasons openly claims they're strongly united ("tamojunto", their hit phrase in Brazil and other countries followed), they weakens people by creating distinct groups to make them look opposed.
"bolsomions" says Bolsonaro is good - in contrast, I say he is bad.
Fearful, pseudo-activists claim Bolsonaro is the worst problem - in contrast, I say there are worse problem hidden.
Being unbiased is asking to be hated by everyone.
Replying to @daniellmesquita (0xddfc2e10702d8a781727a34d83b3bb3ca94a3e91)
You're hated for being unbiased in a polarized world. While Freemasons openly claims they're strongly united ("tamojunto", their hit phrase in Brazil and other countries followed), they weakens people by creating distinct groups to make them look opposed.
People in distinct groups forgets, but they're suffering the same unapparent problem and having a common enemy which uses two different hands to look friendly to both different groups.
That's the key of polarization. Weaken the majority of people, strengthens their enemies.
Replying to @daniellmesquita (0xddfc2e10702d8a781727a34d83b3bb3ca94a3e91)
But, the topic is: In 2018, I said to support Bolsonaro. In 2019, I acted against Bolsonaro's government. But Freemasons can use recordings from both distinct times to show to opposed groups: both activists and Bolsonaro's supporters.
You're hated for being unbiased in a polarized world.
While Freemasons openly claims they're strongly united ("tamojunto", their hit phrase in Brazil and other countries followed), they weakens people by creating distinct groups to make them look opposed.
Replying to @daniellmesquita (0xddfc2e10702d8a781727a34d83b3bb3ca94a3e91)
In 2018, I said to vote Bolsonaro to make people awaken ("oh, there is a dictator, lets fight"); what happened is people writing on Twitter and playing as activists; "bolsominions" did worse, acting physically instead of just Facebook/Twitter, threatening people's life.
But, the topic is: In 2018, I said to support Bolsonaro.
In 2019, I acted against Bolsonaro's government.
But Freemasons can use recordings from both distinct times to show to opposed groups: both activists and Bolsonaro's supporters.
Replying to @daniellmesquita (0xddfc2e10702d8a781727a34d83b3bb3ca94a3e91)
Today with polarization, if you're impartial/unbiased, it's pretty easy to use two distinct groups against you. There are lots of recordings from me not being fanatical; not only all time speaking good things about a thing, but also criticizing.
In 2018, I said to vote Bolsonaro to make people awaken ("oh, there is a dictator, lets fight"); what happened is people writing on Twitter and playing as activists; "bolsominions" did worse, acting physically instead of just Facebook/Twitter, threatening people's life.
Replying to @daniellmesquita (0xddfc2e10702d8a781727a34d83b3bb3ca94a3e91)
...they doesn't know the database is bigger than just 3 billion, but also includes other ~FOUR BILLION people who aren't on Internet - and that the cameras aren't just big cameras on streets - but very small, grain-size cams are already in the news, and more, inside their houses.
There are already news about grain-sized cameras:
If this was authorized to be published, its because they haves even smaller and better cams.
Replying to @daniellmesquita (0xddfc2e10702d8a781727a34d83b3bb3ca94a3e91)
Today with polarization, if you're impartial/unbiased, it's pretty easy to use two distinct groups against you. There are lots of recordings from me not being fanatical; not only all time speaking good things about a thing, but also criticizing.
Freemasonry uses two distinct groups to battle each other to distract people; like slots, they're obliged to choose from only the imposed sides, or they will be hated not only by Freemasons but to other people they will approach.
Hated/ignored, but this price makes me proud.
Replying to @daniellmesquita (0xddfc2e10702d8a781727a34d83b3bb3ca94a3e91)
There are two kinds of persons to polarize and distract people: one sharing news about threatening things, and other saying there are no problem and stating everyone should be calm. I'm not part of neither groups.
Today with polarization, if you're impartial/unbiased, it's pretty easy to use two distinct groups against you.
There are lots of recordings from me not being fanatical; not only all time speaking good things about a thing, but also criticizing.
Replying to @daniellmesquita (0xddfc2e10702d8a781727a34d83b3bb3ca94a3e91)
People shouldn't think blackmailing them using a facial recognition database in streets is a new thing. It is just a release product they calls "news". There were a reason why they permitted the news sites to publish it, hiding the worse things and distracting by a smaller thing.
When people thinks there are big cameras at streets with face database of 3 billion, they calc a smaller force to fight a bigger hidden issue: grain-sized cameras inside their own house and databases of ~8 billion people.
People shouldn't think blackmailing them using a facial recognition database in streets is a new thing. It is just a release product they calls "news". There were a reason why they permitted the news sites to publish it, hiding the worse things and distracting by a smaller thing.
Replying to @daniellmesquita (0xddfc2e10702d8a781727a34d83b3bb3ca94a3e91)
...they doesn't know the database is bigger than just 3 billion, but also includes other ~FOUR BILLION people who aren't on Internet - and that the cameras aren't just big cameras on streets - but very small, grain-size cams are already in the news, and more, inside their houses.
There are two kinds of persons to polarize and distract people: one sharing news about threatening things, and other saying there are no problem and stating everyone should be calm. I'm not part of neither groups.
Replying to @daniellmesquita (0xddfc2e10702d8a781727a34d83b3bb3ca94a3e91)
People worried by big media corporations (simply big corporations, in a different category) spreading news about a startup using mass surveillance in streets using facial recognition from a faces database...
...they doesn't know the database is bigger than just 3 billion, but also includes other ~FOUR BILLION people who aren't on Internet - and that the cameras aren't just big cameras on streets - but very small, grain-size cams are already in the news, and more, inside their houses.
Replying to @daniellmesquita (0xddfc2e10702d8a781727a34d83b3bb3ca94a3e91)
About 8 years ago, a digit. cam with big lens had less quality than my phone today, which haves a quality a past 5 years cam also had need of a big cam+lens to achieve. If technologies for people impressively evolves, what governments hides is even more powerful.
People worried by big media corporations (simply big corporations, in a different category) spreading news about a startup using mass surveillance in streets using facial recognition from a faces database...
Replying to @daniellmesquita (0xddfc2e10702d8a781727a34d83b3bb3ca94a3e91)
Why the worldwide dictator would waste time by waiting people going to street to recognize them, if they're tracked from house to anything? Big data is bigger than facial recognizing; it is just a art piece from this pack. Things are bigger (or smaller) than what news corp. share
About 8 years ago, a digit. cam with big lens had less quality than my phone today, which haves a quality a past 5 years cam also had need of a big cam+lens to achieve.
If technologies for people impressively evolves, what governments hides is even more powerful.
Replying to @daniellmesquita (0xddfc2e10702d8a781727a34d83b3bb3ca94a3e91)
Reading the clearview.ai's site, it is awful to read. Lots of solemn words of far-right sick persons whose acts as protecting a class, just to attack other. This AI facial recognition in streets isn't a feminist technology. It just wants to blackmail people in lawfare.
"Help solve the hardest crimes"
So, try to "help" by putting cameras inside public institutions/agencies, where the biggest crimes are committed.
Replying to @cezarron7 (0xbdda67bcf50b660b1a6aab763b0be17159d40765)
What’s up buddy’s!
You have the poker face to not hide you're spying at our house.
Go live your life; everyone will be in peace if it begins by the privileged persons.
Replying to @daniellmesquita (0xddfc2e10702d8a781727a34d83b3bb3ca94a3e91)
Reading the clearview.ai's site, it is awful to read. Lots of solemn words of far-right sick persons whose acts as protecting a class, just to attack other. This AI facial recognition in streets isn't a feminist technology. It just wants to blackmail people in lawfare.
But, using Tor for visiting a Ethereum's DeFi site (and earning money while your profile matches the ones of other social activists/SJW) is more risky than facial recognition. People are already being tagged and hated. Facial recognition is just a following complement to it.
Replying to @daniellmesquita (0xddfc2e10702d8a781727a34d83b3bb3ca94a3e91)
Why the worldwide dictator would waste time by waiting people going to street to recognize them, if they're tracked from house to anything? Big data is bigger than facial recognizing; it is just a art piece from this pack. Things are bigger (or smaller) than what news corp. share
Reading the clearview.ai's site, it is awful to read.
Lots of solemn words of far-right sick persons whose acts as protecting a class, just to attack other.
This AI facial recognition in streets isn't a feminist technology. It just wants to blackmail people in lawfare.
Replying to @daniellmesquita (0xddfc2e10702d8a781727a34d83b3bb3ca94a3e91)
People haves cameras inside their own house. Who reports that? All their steps are tracked; this and other things are worse. Governments and their partners possess small-sized technology no store sells and more powerful than what the news media reports.
Why the worldwide dictator would waste time by waiting people going to street to recognize them, if they're tracked from house to anything? Big data is bigger than facial recognizing; it is just a art piece from this pack. Things are bigger (or smaller) than what news corp. share
Replying to @daniellmesquita (0xddfc2e10702d8a781727a34d83b3bb3ca94a3e91)
Corporations doesn't makes things to governments, but makes things to people, distracting them in a hype circus. Any technology a corporation demo to the public, governments already haves a more up-to-date and powerful version. They wouldn't afford the risk to make people aware
People haves cameras inside their own house. Who reports that? All their steps are tracked; this and other things are worse.
Governments and their partners possess small-sized technology no store sells and more powerful than what the news media reports.
Replying to @Kik (0x1d6776f6cfb5804724c71d98009acfc3ec564ec8)
Good article. If they're claiming to have a database of 3 billion people, it will be interesting to see how the EU and other governments respond.
I thought you would be more involved in this issue. You simply shows you don't care, because you are privileged.
You act like the majority of Freemasons, by just watching the things and eating popcorn while waiting the death of everything. Go find a psychiatrist
archive.is/1VWKS
Replying to @daniellmesquita (0xddfc2e10702d8a781727a34d83b3bb3ca94a3e91)
A government doesn't needs a enterprise to deliver them a robot/AI/quantum computer. They already does that in their own dependencies. Corporations as we know are for people. A government is a enterprise itself.
Corporations doesn't makes things to governments, but makes things to people, distracting them in a hype circus.
Any technology a corporation demo to the public, governments already haves a more up-to-date and powerful version.
They wouldn't afford the risk to make people aware
Replying to @daniellmesquita (0xddfc2e10702d8a781727a34d83b3bb3ca94a3e91)
Governments doesn't need a hacker group working for them. They are this hacker group themselves - and hires individuals, not groups.
A government doesn't needs a enterprise to deliver them a robot/AI/quantum computer. They already does that in their own dependencies. Corporations as we know are for people. A government is a enterprise itself.
Replying to @daniellmesquita (0xddfc2e10702d8a781727a34d83b3bb3ca94a3e91)
New joke shared in news media: governments loving a app made by a corporation. Governments doesn't needs their own app. They already haves their own experiments and services running. What they needs are the apps people use (Facebook, Twitter).
Governments doesn't need a hacker group working for them. They are this hacker group themselves - and hires individuals, not groups.
New joke shared in news media: governments loving a app made by a corporation.
Governments doesn't needs their own app. They already haves their own experiments and services running. What they needs are the apps people use (Facebook, Twitter).
Replying to @emanuele (0xd5403845084db914fef1efacd7c2c80e21a8ea49)
The privacy paranoid among us have long worried that all of our online photos would be scraped to create a universal face recognition app. My friends it happened and it’s here: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/18/technology/clearview-privacy-facial-recognition.html #privacyMatters
Please upload to IPFS instead of using Internet URL when sharing a important article/content.
Replying to @emanuele (0xd5403845084db914fef1efacd7c2c80e21a8ea49)
The privacy paranoid among us have long worried that all of our online photos would be scraped to create a universal face recognition app. My friends it happened and it’s here: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/18/technology/clearview-privacy-facial-recognition.html #privacyMatters
If I'd shared that 5 years ago, I would be considered insane.
People are already being tracked on streets. And there are worse things happening right now.
Replying to @daniellmesquita (0xddfc2e10702d8a781727a34d83b3bb3ca94a3e91)
What do you mean by "open-source"? The original ideology or the concept adopted by corporations? That explains why they prefers "open" software made by companies as Facebook. ReactJS is a fad, while most of articles and resources doesn't mentions RiotJS and MithrillJS.
Regarding TypeScript, it is useful for text programmers. But the future is about democratization of the programming by the use of event sheets.
Replying to @jm9k (0x50a12017e3e7cb0949e8b823dce156f83732e192)
TypeScript and ReactJS are both widely accepted by the open-source community though. Licensing matters.
What do you mean by "open-source"? The original ideology or the concept adopted by corporations? That explains why they prefers "open" software made by companies as Facebook.
ReactJS is a fad, while most of articles and resources doesn't mentions RiotJS and MithrillJS.
"Microsoft: We're creating a new Rust-like programming language for secure coding"
F$CK your enterprise-made competitor to a community-made project. F$ck TypeScript, ReactJS and any other things made by companies like Microsoft and Facebook.
I don't blame public agencies because of I support decentralization; it is the contrary: I support decentralization because public agencies blames on all of us.
The ideology of Bitcoin is broken. It is open-source and reproducible software, but ASICs are yet closed-source. RISC-V is a open ISA for building royalty-free custom CPUs, but the crypto industry ignores it.
@ttk314 @DeborahSimpier @AltheaNetwork are there funding/incentivization programs for spawning a new Althea network? Brazil is poor on that.
Replying to @daniellmesquita (0xddfc2e10702d8a781727a34d83b3bb3ca94a3e91)
On conflicts of interests and needs, only paradoxes can bring consensus.
The only way to stop contradictions, confusion and death, is to consider paradoxes are discernible.
Replying to @daniellmesquita (0xddfc2e10702d8a781727a34d83b3bb3ca94a3e91)
When it doesn't comes from human words, there aren't a "contradictions" thing, but non-discernible paradoxes.
On conflicts of interests and needs, only paradoxes can bring consensus.
When it doesn't comes from human words, there aren't a "contradictions" thing, but non-discernible paradoxes.